Case Analysis_The University Art Museum Essay

Executive SummaryThis report was commissioned as a case analysis to examine why the last devil directors of the University Art Museum were seemingly at odds with the university and failed in their mission to lead the museum into the future. Further it provides prospective on how to move the museum into the future through successful management. issue AnalysisThe University Art Museum was a generous gift donated by the son of the universitys first president, who was also a campus alumnus. The university took great pride in the museum and til now highlighted the museums photo on campus brochures and catalogs for years. However, in recent years university was not exactly pleased with the direction the museum was headed under either of its most recent 2 directors. It became abundantly clear that the directors had a different vision for the museum than did the university faculty.There was so much tension amongst parties that the previous director had sharply attacked the faculty as eli tist and clannish and as believing that art belongs to the rich, (Daft, 2013). What we gather from the case for analysis is that university did not clearly outline the direction of the museum, provide a mission statement, or occupy any formal written policy about how to run the museum or move the museum into the future. We also gather that prior to 1998 the museum ran just fine without the university needing any formalities. This could partly equate to the fact that the passkey director and his successor were previous students of the university.As students of the university they may have already had a pretty good idea of how the university operated. excessly, the original director was also the founder of the museum. Whatever the case may be it wasnt until the university began hiring outside the university that there seemed to be a major disconnect. At this identify it is clear that there are some design essentials that need to be incorporated before hiring another director. Wit h that being said, organizations exist for a exercise and that purpose inescapably to be clearly defined.The university faculty should first decide the organizations strategic intent which includes a clear andspecific mission, a vision, and the principles of the university. Additional aspects of strategic intent are competitive advantage and onus competence. In knowing the competitive advantage of the museum and the core competence, the faculty will be demote positioned to build a strategy. Once the mission and goals are established the university should be able to set clear operating goals.Additionally, the faculty members need to take a long look at what they consider the failures of the previous two directors and see how their attempts to move the university into the future can be adjusted to fit the needfully of the university, the needs of the community and lastly, paint the university in a better light, one not viewed as elitist or snobbish. Simply returning the universit y to its previous state could confirm to be detrimental. Lastly, the university needs to have some formal measure in positioning to assess effectiveness of the strategies set forth. Simply put, just because the faculty is clever with the direction the museum is headed, doesnt make it a successful venture.ConclusionIn conclusion, it is clear why the previous two directors have failed to be successful in fulfilling the mission of the university. Quite simply, there was no mission defined, no goals, no formal policies or principles, and no vision. If any director is to be successful the university needs to take the appropriate measures in spearheading that success. First and foremost, a mission statement must be formulated.The organization needs to understand the competitive advantage and core competence of the museum and built a suitable strategy or strategies around these values. Lastly, there needs to be a formal measure in place to assess the effectiveness. Once the university h as taken the necessary steps to lead the museum in the direction it wants for the future, they will be far more successful in decision the right director for the job. Most importantly, the director will do a much better job of meeting the goals of the university faculty. ReferencesDaft. R. L. (2013). Organization Theory & Design. Mason, OH South-Western, Cengage Learning.